The anomaly on the rising board
The skouted.ai rising board is full of teenagers with promise and contracts. This week it contains one entry that makes no sense until you look closely: J. Talvitie, a 20-year-old Finnish central midfielder at NAC Breda, rated 71 OVR, valued between €4.7M and €7.7M, carrying a UV score of 99, the highest undervaluation grade the model assigns.
And a contract status that reads, simply, Expired.
What he actually is
Talvitie arrived at NAC Breda on loan from Lommel SK and spent the 2025 season in the Dutch top flight. His Eredivisie numbers:
| Metric | 2025 Eredivisie |
|---|---|
| Appearances | 27 |
| Goals | 3 |
| Assists | 2 |
| Minutes | 1,399 |
| Goals per 90 | 0.19 |
| Assists per 90 | 0.13 |
Twenty-seven appearances in the Eredivisie at 19 years old is not a cameo. NAC Breda gave him real minutes in one of Europe’s best development leagues, and he contributed in five of them directly. He is a left-footed central midfielder, 177cm, whose passing range is graded by the model as his primary strength.
Why a 99 UV score matters here
The UV score compares a player’s on-pitch rating to his market value. A 99 means the model believes the gap between what Talvitie produces and what he would cost is as wide as the scale allows. Most 99-UV players on the rising board cost a few million because their clubs hold long contracts.
Talvitie’s contract status is expired. The market value of €4.7M to €7.7M describes what he would be worth under contract. What he actually costs, in a negotiation that can start today, is a signing bonus and a wage.
Every summer, Eredivisie clubs sell 20-year-old rotation midfielders with one strong season for €5m to €10m. Talvitie is that exact profile, minus the transfer fee. This is the single cheapest entry point on the rising board.
Who should be calling
The realistic landing zone is a mid-table club in the Netherlands, Belgium, Austria or Scandinavia that starts him immediately, or a second-tier club in a big-five league with a path to the first team. The risk is the classic free-agent risk: no data confidence issue here, his confidence grade is high, but only 1,399 top-flight minutes means the projection carries variance.
The model’s deal score of 68 reflects that balance. The upside case is a full international career, and the downside case is a free transfer that cost almost nothing to test.
AI Verdict: Strong Buy
For clubs, this is the strongest buy signal the rising board currently offers: 99 UV, high data confidence, top-flight experience before 21, and no transfer fee. For NAC Breda, the failure to convert his loan into a controlled contract situation is the kind of administrative error that ends up funding a rival’s squad.
View full profile and AI-powered transfer intelligence at skouted.ai